Wednesday, September 30, 2026
The SA-6 Gainful
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
HQ-7B - Chinese-made short-range air defense (SHORAD)
![]() |
| HQ-7B - CHINA |
![]() |
| FM-90 , PAKISTAN |
![]() |
| Crotale missile French |
![]() |
| FM-90 BANGLADESH |
Sunday, September 13, 2026
The Chinese Rocket Force (PLARF)
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
S-300 - Russian long-range surface-to-air missile
Monday, August 31, 2026
Long-Range Hypersonic Weapons and Missile Development
![]() |
| Dark Eagle / LRHW (Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon) |
![]() |
| HALO (Hypersonic Air-Launched Offensive Anti-Surface) |
![]() |
| DF-27 |
![]() |
| DF-17 |
![]() |
| Oreshnik |
![]() |
| Kinzhal (Kh-47M2) |
![]() |
| Oreshnik |
![]() |
| India (LR-AShM) |
![]() |
| Taiwan (Chingtian) |
Sunday, July 19, 2026
Iranian Civilian Aircraft Missile Shot by US Warship (Iran Air - 655)
The Iran Air Flight 655 tragedy was the shooting down of an Iranian civilian commercial airliner by the United States warship USS Vincennes over the Persian Gulf on July 3, 1988. This tragic incident killed all 290 passengers and crew, including 66 children and infants.
![]() |
| illustration |
Brief Chronology of Events
Flight Route: The Iran Air Airbus A300 took off from Bandar Abbas, Iran, bound for Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Gulf Conflict: At the time, the Persian Gulf situation was tense due to the Iran-Iraq War. The USS Vincennes was engaged in a firefight with Iranian military speedboats.
Mistaken Identification: The USS Vincennes crew detected the aircraft through its Aegis radar system but mistakenly identified it as an Iranian F-14 Tomcat fighter jet preparing to attack.
![]() |
| USS Vincennes |
Missile Execution: The captain of the USS Vincennes, William Chapel Roger III (Capt. Will Rogers), ordered the missile launch. A US warship fired two RIM-66 Standard MR (SM-1MR) surface-to-air missiles, instantly destroying the aircraft in mid-air over the Strait of Hormuz.
![]() |
| RIM-66 Standard MR (SM-1MR) surface-to-air missiles |
Impact and Aftermath
Losses: A total of 290 people died, making it one of the deadliest aviation disasters in history.
The majority of victims were Iranian citizens (254), followed by citizens of the United Arab Emirates, India, Pakistan, Yugoslavia, and Italy.
![]() |
| Debris of Iran Air Flight 655 |
United States Position: The US government expressed deep regret for the loss of civilian life, but never issued a formal apology for the military action.
Compensation: Through a 1996 settlement at the International Court of Justice, the US agreed to pay $61.8 million in compensation to the families of the Iranian victims.
Friday, June 19, 2026
The Cheongung Missile System II (MSAM-II)
Wednesday, May 20, 2026
The Evolution of Tank Destroyers
Tank destroyers evolved from World War II tactics that relied on high-speed, mobile anti-tank guns. This doctrine has now been replaced by vehicles equipped with anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), which combine high mobility with the ability to destroy heavy armor from long distances without direct engagement.
The following is a track record of the evolution of tank destroyers over time:
1. World War II Era: The Birth of Special Doctrines
During World War II, the pressing need to counter massive tank formations gave rise to two main doctrines:
Allied (US) Doctrine: Forming Tank Destroyer Battalions using light, open, and extremely fast tracked vehicles such as the M18 Hellcat. Their tactic was "search, hit, and destroy" using hit-and-run tactics.
![]() |
| M18 hellcat |
Axis Doctrine (Germany & Soviet Union): Developed casemate-mounted anti-tank guns, such as the German Jagdpanzer series (e.g., the Nashorn) or the Soviet SU-85, to provide heavy firepower at a lower production cost than standard tanks.
![]() |
| Nashorn |
![]() |
| SU-85 |
2. Post-World War II: Concept Unification (1945–1960)
Toward the end of the war, the tank destroyer doctrine began to be abandoned. Main Battle Tanks (MBTs) such as the M48 Patton or T-55 evolved with much more powerful cannons and thicker armor. The mobility and firepower of modern tanks ultimately made specialized gun-mounted tank destroyers irrelevant and inefficient for operational purposes for armed forces.
3. Cold War to Modern Era: The Birth of the ATGM (1960s–Present)
To counter the massive armored formations of the Cold War, global militaries introduced the ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missile). These specialized vehicles no longer relied on large, heavy cannons, but instead relied on guided missiles.
Advantages: Allows light armored vehicles to disable advanced tanks from very long ranges, often beyond the firing range of enemy tank guns. Modern Examples: Modern vehicles such as the missile-equipped Marder (Germany), the M1134 Stryker ATGM (USA), and modern amphibious vehicles from Russia and China have adopted many fast and easily deployed wheeled platforms.
![]() |
| M1134 Stryker ATGM |
4. Current and Future Warfare (2020s)
In contemporary conflicts (including the war in Ukraine), the traditional role of the tank destroyer is evolving again. The threat comes not only from tanks, but also from deadly drones (UAVs).
In addition to using anti-tank missiles mounted on light armored vehicles, destroyer tactics are now being largely replaced by infantry units using shoulder-mounted missiles (such as the Javelin or NLAW) and kamikaze drone attacks to destroy modern tanks.
![]() |
| Javelin missile - TNI AD |
The role of the tank destroyer has shifted from being solely a dedicated anti-tank gun to a multi-role platform that integrates long-range missiles to provide precision fire support against enemy armored vehicles.
Sunday, March 1, 2026
Iran's missile arsenal - 2026
Iran's missile arsenal is currently the largest and most diverse in the Middle East, with an estimated inventory of over 3,000 ballistic missiles.
The following is a key classification of Iranian missiles based on their latest technology as of early 2026:
1. Hypersonic Missiles
Iran has advanced to hypersonic technology, designed to penetrate layered air defense systems like Iron Dome.
Fattah-1: Iran's first hypersonic missile, with a terminal speed of Mach 13–15 and high maneuverability.
Fattah-2: The latest variant utilizes Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) technology, allowing the projectile to glide and maneuver after initial launch to avoid interception.
2. Ballistic Missiles (Medium & Long Range)
Iran's primary focus is improving accuracy and destructive power at ranges of up to 2,000 km.
Khorramshahr-4 (Kheibar): Iran's most lethal missile currently available, with a range of 2,000 km and a heavy warhead weighing 1,500 kg.
Sejil: A two-stage solid-fuel missile with a range of 2,500 km and a very high speed (over 17,000 km/h).
Shahab-3, Ghadr, and Emad: The backbone of the medium-range attack missiles with a range of between 1,300 km and 1,800 km.
Haj Qassem and Qassem Basir: Tactical ballistic missiles with a range of approximately 1,200–1,400 km.
3. Cruise Missiles
Unlike ballistic missiles, Iranian cruise missiles fly low to avoid radar detection.
Abu Mahdi: A long-range (1,000+ km) anti-ship cruise missile that uses artificial intelligence navigation to attack maritime targets.
Paveh: A new land-based cruise missile with a range of 1,650 km capable of striking from multiple directions.
Hoveyzeh and Soumar: Strategic cruise missiles designed for all-weather, surface-to-surface precision strikes.
![]() |
| Hoveyzeh |
![]() |
| Soumar |
Despite having expended hundreds of missiles in recent conflicts, Iran reportedly continues to regenerate its stockpile through underground production facilities known as "missile cities."
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)



.jpg)


.jpg)
.jpg)



.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)







.jpg)






